The purpose of this research is to analyze the turn-taking in Supreme Court civil
case in United States, Sveen v. Melin, decided on June 11, 2018, which this
mechanisms occur in the conversation to make the conversation flows well. The
objectives of this research are: (1) to analyze how the turn-taking occur in Sveen v.
Melin case on June 11, 2018 conversation and (2) to identify the dominant types of
turn-taking that are used by the participants in the Sveen v. Melin case on June 11,
2018 conversation. The research questions will be answered in analytical description.
This research uses turn-taking theory proposed by Jacob L Mey to analyze the turntaking
which
occurs
in
the
conversation
of
Supreme
Court
civil
case
in
United
States,

Sveen
v. Melin,
decided
on
June
11, 2018.

There are three kinds of turn-taking
mechanisms which are taking the floor, holding the floor and yielding the floor.
Qualitative method is used in this research. The collected data are selected randomly
then be classified on the same classes. The result of this research shows that there are
209 data classified as turn-taking, which are 88 data of taking the turn, including 20
data of starting up (12 data of clear start and 8 data of hesitant start), 42 data of
interruption, and 26 data of overlapping; 63 data of holding the turn, and 58 data of
yielding the turn were found in the conversation. The dominant types of turn-taking
that are used by the participants are holding the turn, each of participants does not want
the floor is being taken over so they hold their floor.

SI19029

SKR BSI 19029

Perpustakaan FAH (Skrispsi SI)

Tersedia namun tidak untuk dipinjamkan - No Loan

• Fulltext

Share :